Posts Tagged ‘private workspaces’

SCM Team Collaboration

October 26th, 2007 by rmohr

It’s amazing how many times I’m asked about how you can collaborate on sub-projects or individual features with other developers without affecting the rest of the development team.  As a matter of fact, this came up the other day, which is why I thought it would make a good post.

There are several ways that teams can collaborate in AccuRev, and depending upon what the situation is, would choose different methods.  I describe two simple scenarios where 2 developers are working on a few files together and another where several developers are teamed together to work on a sub-project.

Scenario 1: Two developers are working on the same foo.c file and must complete the work before it can be merged with the rest of the project (ie. promoted).

The great thing about private workspaces is that developers have a place where they can commit their code without impacting the rest of the team.  The code *is* placed on the server, but still remains private to the developer.  Meaning, other developers who update their workspaces will not propagate those changes into their private workspaces.

However, since the code *is* on the server, another developer can explicitly pull that version into their workspace using the “send to workspace” command (aka. “co”).  The developer can make changes and keep the file to place the new version on the server, again stored in the private workspace.  This exchange continues until the work is completed and the file can be promoted to be shared with the rest of the team.

This is typically a good method to use for collaborating on just a few files, but what if you had an entire sub-project to share with many developers.

Scenario 2: Many developers working on entire sub-project which must be completed with testing before merging with the rest of the project.

This scenario is the “bread and butter” of what AccuRev and the stream based architecture is all about.

To set this up, you simply create a stream for the sub-project from the main project stream.  The sub-project development team creates workspaces off the sub-project stream while the rest of the development group is based upon the main project stream.

With inheritance, any changes made by the main project team is automatically inherited by the sub-project team so they [sub-project team] are continuously integrating with the main development effort.  The main project team is completely unaffected by the changes made by the sub-project team.  The sub-project team can also control what changes are inherited into their stream by setting a time basis on their stream.  The time basis will only allow the changes to flow into their stream up to the time set.

Eventhough I described this scenario as a method for larger groups, it can also be used for the simple case of 2 developers working on the same file.   Streams are so architectually light weight, that they can be created and removed in a matter of seconds.

 I hope this little tip helped for those looking to collaborate.

Reparenting Workspaces – What’s the hype?

September 21st, 2007 by dave

By now you’ve probably heard about workspace reparenting in AccuRev. You know… the fancy drag-n-drop of a workspace from one stream to another. But what’s all the hype? Ultimately, workspace reparenting means that a workspace, on disk, can ‘morph’ into the configuration of it’s parent stream (See video) . So one day you are working on a mainline feature and the next day, with a single command, you can instantly have the configuration from a buggy release 2 months ago on disk, in the same location, with the exact configuration of files at that point in time. Poof! Reparenting VideoWell… first off, reparenting isn’t magic. You see, each and every stream in AccuRev knows at least two things – (1) its parent stream and (2) any active changes to its own relative configuration. Knowledge of the parent stream is by way of reference, in the same way that an OO subclass knows of its parent class. So if you change the parent reference, you instantly have visibility into the new parent configuration, in combination with any active changes that come along for the ride (as needed, most likely). Remember, workspaces are streams too!

Fun Toy or Power Tool?

The only “fun toy” you’ll find in AccuRev is the easter egg hidden in Help–>About where if you press CapsLock-Pause with your left hand you can play a tetris clone… ok, kidding. Workspace reparenting is a wickedly powerful feature that, when used properly, can save time, energy, and disk space and be a great powertool. So when is reparenting useful?

Retargeting a Delivery – Remember the time when you spent Saturday night cranking out a hot-fix… only for it to be reclassified to a lower priority on Monday and scheduled for next weeks build? No problem! Simply reparent your workspace from the release hotfix stream to the mainline area and promote the changes. done. go home.

Large Code Footprints – Lets say you have a 400Gb footprint of source code for any given release. On a particular day, you just finished committing 174 source files to mainline for a new feature. You then get tasked to the bug squad to tackle 9 high-priority bugs found in the recent production release. Rather than creating a brand new workspace from the old release snapshot, you can simply reparent your ‘mainline’ workspace and run update. You’ll most likely get the old versions of 174 files and probably a few dozen or hundred other files that changed… but the point is, you just get the delta. And waiting for 2G of changes over the wire compared to 400G is a significant time savings for you and others sharing the pipe.

Tracing Defects - You know those bugs that crop up and someone asks, “how long has that runtime defect been around?” Take a single workspace, create a unit test that forces the failure, then reparent to each and every release snapshot in question. Each time you do an update, you’ll get a corresponding configuration of code on disk -and- the tweaked unit test (active changes come along for the ride, remember!). Run the test, verify the failure. Bingo – a recipe to quickly test how far back a defect went. Just keep reparenting and running the test(s) until you find a configuration that works.

Rapid Application Development – Are you responsible for cranking out a few features all at once? Need to hop between them frequently? Sure, you could create a separate workspace for each feature and that’s probably a better practice in most cases… but nothing stops you from using a single workspace and context-switching by reparenting. As long as you keep/promote each feature’s set of files out of the workspace, then reparenting is a breeze. This works well if you follow a stream-per-feature paradigm.

So now you might say, “But isn’t reparenting the same as updating my local work area with a different ‘branch’?” Nope. Don’t forget about the most significant architectural difference between streams and branches… inheritance. We’ll save that for another thread.

One of the great things about workspaces is that they are a super tiny meta-data record in the AccuRev meta-database… just a pointer to parent stream and pointer to host machine and dir on disk. That’s it. Workspaces are cheap entities. Reparenting simply changes the single parent reference reference and updating only retrieves the deltas. Make reparenting part of your routine and the benefits will follow.

/happy reparenting/ – dave