<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Defect Tracking Dead in an Agile World?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://accurev.com/blog/2008/01/02/is-defect-tracking-dead-in-an-agile-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://accurev.com/blog/2008/01/02/is-defect-tracking-dead-in-an-agile-world/</link>
	<description>SCM and Agile Software Development Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosin</title>
		<link>http://accurev.com/blog/2008/01/02/is-defect-tracking-dead-in-an-agile-world/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 21:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.accurev.com/2008/01/02/is-defect-tracking-dead-in-an-agile-world/#comment-379</guid>
		<description>So, lets see... A bug gets reported, a programmer starts working on it. Then another bug is reported. The programmer writes it down on a piece of paper so he won&#039;t forget it. Then another one is reported. The programmer, says to himself &quot;Ya know, instead of writing all these bugs down on a piece of paper, I&#039;ll put them in a database somewhere. And I&#039;ll write a web interface to it so I can get the bugs at home too.&quot; Thus a Defect Tracking System is born into an Agile World.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, lets see&#8230; A bug gets reported, a programmer starts working on it. Then another bug is reported. The programmer writes it down on a piece of paper so he won&#8217;t forget it. Then another one is reported. The programmer, says to himself &#8220;Ya know, instead of writing all these bugs down on a piece of paper, I&#8217;ll put them in a database somewhere. And I&#8217;ll write a web interface to it so I can get the bugs at home too.&#8221; Thus a Defect Tracking System is born into an Agile World.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory von Wallenstein</title>
		<link>http://accurev.com/blog/2008/01/02/is-defect-tracking-dead-in-an-agile-world/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory von Wallenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 02:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.accurev.com/2008/01/02/is-defect-tracking-dead-in-an-agile-world/#comment-378</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard of folks say the same... from my experience, it&#039;s often only when multiple reports in the issue tracking system come in that we have enough information to actually reproduce the problem and fix it. If we were to just dive right into the code on the first report of a problem, it would take multiple times the effort to fix the problem than if we were armed with a handful of scenarios that can be used to reproduce and isolate the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard of folks say the same&#8230; from my experience, it&#8217;s often only when multiple reports in the issue tracking system come in that we have enough information to actually reproduce the problem and fix it. If we were to just dive right into the code on the first report of a problem, it would take multiple times the effort to fix the problem than if we were armed with a handful of scenarios that can be used to reproduce and isolate the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

